W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: i51, was: Moving to editorial: i39 / i51 / i61 / i64 / i94

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:47:06 +0200
Message-ID: <47FCC8DA.6040702@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Mark Nottingham wrote:
> 
> 
> On 04/04/2008, at 1:25 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>
>> HN> Maybe we shoud split the HTTP-date BNF for the older dates in two 
>> steps
>> HN> to stress this within the BNF as well? I.e. something like the
>> HN> following:
>> HN>
>> HN>     HTTP-date     = rfc1123-date | obsolete-date
>> HN>     obsolete-date = rfc850-date | asctime-date
> 
> 
> +1

Ok, change applied and issue closed with 
<http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/239>.

BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2008 13:47:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:47 GMT