W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 00:56:04 +0200
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1207436164.11881.48.camel@HenrikLaptop>

fre 2008-04-04 klockan 10:06 +1100 skrev Mark Nottingham:
> I've tested a fairly wide variety of proxies with co-advisor; the
> only  
> one that passed the related set of tests was very recent builds of  
> Squid (2.7DEVEL0). Everything else -- including Squid 2.6STABLE4 --  
> failed (it would take some digging to figure out exactly where this  
> happened, unless Henrik knows; regardless, I think it's safe to say  
> that a very large proportion of Squid's installed base fails as well).

Squid-2.6 is an HTTP/1.0 proxy. It does not have to or even need to look
into Expect. In HTTP/1.0 Expect is just an extension header like any
other extension header.

Regards
Henrik
Received on Saturday, 5 April 2008 22:57:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:46 GMT