Re: RFC 2616, partitioned

Mark Nottingham wrote:
> 
> Well, rfcdiff of draft-lafon-00 to p1-messaging gives this:
>   
> <http://www.mnot.net/test/p1-messaging-from-draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-00.diff.html> 
> 
> ...which is pretty good at showing one change.
> 
> It would be nice to show them all side-by-side, but I don't see any easy 
> way to do that.

A better comparison may be 
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/p1-messaging-from-rfc2616.diff.html>, 
as it seems Mark had problems running xml2rfc on the "enhanced" XML 
source (which uses extension elements ignored by xml2rfc).

Anyway: I believe we don't necessarily need to decide the #-of-documents 
question right away. If people think that would be useful, I'm willing 
to look into automating the process of splitting up the spec; some 
additional markup + conditional text can make this work.

Best regards, Julian