W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2007

Re: semantic error in RFC 2616

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:43:16 +1000
Message-Id: <7B8B098C-7788-4F83-B3AF-D7FBF78D68F0@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
To: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>

Now i87 (usually this would just be an instruction to the editors,  
but since it's in the base RFC, it's worth capturing).

<http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i87>

On 08/09/2007, at 10:49 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:

>
> This typo is still in the current draft.
>
>   s/ought to used/ought to be used/;
>
> ....Roy
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Nathan Collette <ncollette ... sabioso.com>
> ...
>> I understand that you are the current editor of RFC 2616.  I was  
>> reading the specification and I came across an error in section  
>> 13.2.2 Heuristic Expiration.
>>
>> "they ought to used cautiously, and we encourage" should be "they  
>> ought to *be* used cautiously, and we encourage"
>>
>> Just thought you might care,
>> Nate
>


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 12 October 2007 06:45:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:22 GMT