Re: NEW ISSUE: rel_path not used

On sön, 2007-10-07 at 20:57 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Proposal:
> 
> 1) get rid of the mention in 3.2.1, and

Yes.

> 
> 2) in 13.9 paragraph 2, replace
>  
>   ...query URLs (those containing a "?" in the rel_path part)...
> 
> by
>  ...URLs containing a query part...

Yes.

The reference to rel_path is plain wrong here as rel_path do not include
the query part, and additionally is not allowed to be used in HTTP
request URIs..

relative URIs (which rel_path is a subset component of) is only allowed
in Content-Location and Referer.

Regards
Henrik

Received on Monday, 8 October 2007 14:38:52 UTC