W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: [RFC] Optional header negotitation

From: Stefanos Harhalakis <v13@priest.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:58:40 +0300
To: "Robert Brewer" <fumanchu@aminus.org>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <200708201658.40561.v13@priest.com>

On Monday 20 August 2007, Robert Brewer wrote:
> I am sorry I misinterpreted that bit. However, I don't
> think that changes my central reservation: that HTTP
> already allows enough ways to ask for extended headers
> that there's no need to canonicalize one of those ways.
> Every previous HTTP app which has needed additional
> headers seems to have done just fine without a formal
> "Header-Request" response header. So I'd find an extra
> RFC on the matter just as spurious, serving only to
> complicate web app framework and user agent code
> unnecessarily.

  Can you please provide me with additional information about how apps are 
doing this? As far as I see it, javascript is not an option and I'm not aware 
of another method...
Received on Monday, 20 August 2007 13:59:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:15 GMT