- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:52:31 +0200
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- CC: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Mark Baker wrote: >> Also, I'd clarify that the default response for a successful PATCH would >> be 204, not 208. > > Why would a default be needed? OK, let me rephrase that: I don't want a default status, but a default preference; and that should be not to return the whole entity. > ... Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 3 August 2007 12:52:53 UTC