W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:03:17 -0700
Message-Id: <E683E58C-B68E-407F-BCAE-33D298980FEA@yahoo-inc.com>
Cc: "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>

Really? That doesn't seem to help caching or linking very much.  
Although the semantics of the HTTP scheme currently are "that the  
identified resource is located at the server listening for TCP  
connections on that port of that host."



On 2007/07/25, at 1:00 PM, Mark Baker wrote:

> On 7/25/07, Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>> I've been wondering about this for a little while, and would very
>> much like to see more work in this area. One of the interesting
>> questions is how you'd layer HTTP-over-SCTP onto the existing Web;
>> Upgrade doesn't quite meet the requirement (it's a whole new
>> connection). Seems like one more piece of site-wide metadata to
>> advertise...
>
> I expect a new URI scheme would be required.
>
> Mark.
> -- 
> Mark Baker.  Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.         http://www.markbaker.ca
> Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies  http://www.coactus.com

--
Mark Nottingham       mnot@yahoo-inc.com
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2007 20:03:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:15 GMT