Re: PATCH and WebDAV, was Re: PATCH Draft

Julian Reschke wrote:
> James M Snell wrote:
>> I can understand why this would be desirable. I, however, am nowhere
>> near qualified to discuss any reasonable considerations for WebDAV.
> 
> Well, we can help with that; it's just not clear whether we want that in
> the same spec. Many people automatically ignore things just because the
> term WebDAV comes up.
> 

Yep. It would make just as much sense to put in an Atompub
considerations section.  I'm just not sure we really should include it here.

- James