Re: Required DIFF format [was Re: PATCH Draft] from James M Snell on 2007-06-28 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2007)

From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:42:25 -0700
To: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
CC: 'Julian Reschke' <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, 'Lisa Dusseault' <ldusseault@commerce.net>, 'Stefan Eissing' <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <4683F301.4070804@gmail.com>

What would be the rationale for this?

- James

Larry Masinter wrote:
> I suggest multipart/byteranges as the basis for a possible MTI format for
> partial updates.
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 28 June 2007 17:42:37 UTC