Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis

On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:30:57PM +1000,
 Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote 
 a message of 19 lines which said:

> My experience is that it isn't adequate for even those purposes, in
> many cases.

More elaborate comments are welcome. Specially if we embark on a
revision of 2617 :-)

Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2007 11:56:14 UTC