W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis

From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:56:09 +0200
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20070612115609.GA12826@nic.fr>

On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:30:57PM +1000,
 Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote 
 a message of 19 lines which said:

> My experience is that it isn't adequate for even those purposes, in
> many cases.

More elaborate comments are welcome. Specially if we embark on a
revision of 2617 :-)
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2007 11:56:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:10 GMT