W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2006

NEW ISSUE: inconsistency in date format explanation

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:46:39 +0100
Message-ID: <4561BFCF.1040404@gmx.de>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Hi.

In Section 3.3.1, RFC2616 says 
(<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-3.3.1>):

"The second format is in common use, but is based on the obsolete RFC 
850 [12] date format and lacks a four-digit year."

However, [12] refers to RFC1036, which obsoletes RFC850.

Proposal: change to:

"The second format is in common use, but is based on the obsolete 
RFC1036 date format [12] and lacks a four-digit year."

Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 20 November 2006 14:46:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:49:53 GMT