W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: ETags vs Variants, was: Revising RFC2616 - what's happening

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 23:02:08 +0200
Message-ID: <45393950.3090601@gmx.de>
To: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
CC: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Henrik Nordstrom schrieb:
> fre 2006-10-20 klockan 20:46 +0200 skrev Julian Reschke:
> 
>> Right. So we don't want the cache to serve the cached response in 
>> absence of the request header, right?
> 
> Only if it has a matching request/response pair from a request absent of
> the header.

I think I disagree. Maybe it's really time to come up with either 
pseudocode or precise formal definitions.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 20 October 2006 21:02:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:49:53 GMT