W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: ETags vs Variants, was: Revising RFC2616 - what's happening

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:42:55 +0200
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1161376975.29399.183.camel@henriknordstrom.net>

fre 2006-10-20 klockan 20:46 +0200 skrev Julian Reschke:

> Right. So we don't want the cache to serve the cached response in 
> absence of the request header, right?

Only if it has a matching request/response pair from a request absent of
the header.

Regards
Henrik

Received on Friday, 20 October 2006 20:57:58 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: security requirements"
Previous message: Julian Reschke: "Re: ETags vs Variants, was: Revising RFC2616 - what's happening"
In reply to: Julian Reschke: "Re: ETags vs Variants, was: Revising RFC2616 - what's happening"
Next in thread: Julian Reschke: "Re: ETags vs Variants, was: Revising RFC2616 - what's happening"
Reply: Julian Reschke: "Re: ETags vs Variants, was: Revising RFC2616 - what's happening"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 6 June 2008 08:04:30 GMT