W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: ETags vs Variants, was: Revising RFC2616 - what's happening

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 01:03:56 +0200
Message-ID: <4538045C.10608@gmx.de>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
CC: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Jamie Lokier schrieb:
> ...
> While on the subject of Etag and variants, it's never been clear what
> a Vary header that names a header not in the original request means.
> ...

For the record: I fully agree with your analysis; it seems to be the 
only way this can work in practice. We are doing the same in our server 
code, and so far haven't encountered any problems with that.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2006 23:05:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:49:53 GMT