References in RFC2616, was: Revising RFC2616 - what's happening

OK,

here's something cosmetic that I'd like to fix in draft 01: we have 
currently a few entries in the References section that aren't used in 
the specification text.

In particular:

1) RFC1866 (HTML 2.0) - this seems to be a leftover from RFC2068 
(definition of the LINK header, gone from RFC2616)

2) RFC2069 (Digest Auth) - again, a leftover from RFC2068, obsoleted by 
RFC2617.

3) RFC2026 (Standards Process) - only used in the front matter, I don't 
think it needs to appear in the References section.

Any objections to those being removed in draft 01?

Best regards, Julian