References in RFC2616, was: Revising RFC2616 - what's happening

• From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
• Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:20:10 +0200
• To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <45376D7A.2010901@gmx.de>

OK,

here's something cosmetic that I'd like to fix in draft 01: we have 
currently a few entries in the References section that aren't used in 
the specification text.

In particular:

1) RFC1866 (HTML 2.0) - this seems to be a leftover from RFC2068 
(definition of the LINK header, gone from RFC2616)

2) RFC2069 (Digest Auth) - again, a leftover from RFC2068, obsoleted by 
RFC2617.

3) RFC2026 (Standards Process) - only used in the front matter, I don't 
think it needs to appear in the References section.

Any objections to those being removed in draft 01?

Best regards, Julian

Received on Thursday, 19 October 2006 12:20:17 UTC