W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2006

References in RFC2616, was: Revising RFC2616 - what's happening

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:20:10 +0200
Message-ID: <45376D7A.2010901@gmx.de>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

OK,

here's something cosmetic that I'd like to fix in draft 01: we have 
currently a few entries in the References section that aren't used in 
the specification text.

In particular:

1) RFC1866 (HTML 2.0) - this seems to be a leftover from RFC2068 
(definition of the LINK header, gone from RFC2616)

2) RFC2069 (Digest Auth) - again, a leftover from RFC2068, obsoleted by 
RFC2617.

3) RFC2026 (Standards Process) - only used in the front matter, I don't 
think it needs to appear in the References section.

Any objections to those being removed in draft 01?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2006 12:20:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:49:53 GMT