Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12 from Wilfredo Sánchez Vega on 2006-06-21 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2006)

From: Wilfredo Sánchez Vega <wsanchez@wsanchez.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:23:20 -0700
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, ietf@ietf.org, Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>, CalDAV DevList <ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <59B1DDE0-1429-40F2-92F4-3FD91C321203@wsanchez.net>

   Actually, I remember sending a few emails with feedback on this  
and not getting any replies, and then I went on my honeymoon, so it  
wasn't quite on my mind for a while.

   I think that document is the way to go, even if all it ends up  
saying is something similar to what you have in the CalDAV draft.

	-wsv

On Jun 20, 2006, at 4:59 PM, Lisa Dusseault wrote:

> We basically tried that.  What it turned into was this <http:// 
> www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-whitehead-http-etag-00.txt> with  
> no consensus on the basic model or apparent drive to come to  
> consensus.  Got any feedback on that draft?

Attachments

application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s

Received on Wednesday, 21 June 2006 17:23:16 UTC