Justin Chapweske wrote: > This would be another example why an explicit error reporting URI in the > response headers would be a better way to go. The system could > dynamically include unique identifiers for the generating server and > include that in the URI, and perhaps have all URIs for a cluster of > servers point a single error reporting server. It's probably obvious, but fwiw I agree. An error reporting URI, plus a standard indicating _what_ should be reported and how. Alex's point about revealing data if the report is too detailed is also important. -- JamieReceived on Wednesday, 23 June 2004 14:34:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 6 June 2008 08:04:28 GMT