W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: PATCH thoughts...

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 16:10:43 -0700
Cc: HTTP working group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
Message-Id: <465EB61C-9969-11D8-9E30-000393753936@gbiv.com>


> Who should I acknowledge for the original definition of PATCH?

Me and Henrik, I guess, though you can simply mention that it was
originally proposed in early drafts HTTP/1.1, but removed from that
specification due to lack of maturity compared to the core protocol
and based on the theory that the at-that-time future WebDAV group
would take it up eventually.

....Roy

Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2004 19:11:10 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Greg Stein: "Re: PATCH vs PUT w/Content-Range"
Previous message: Lisa Dusseault: "Re: PATCH thoughts..."
In reply to: Lisa Dusseault: "Re: PATCH thoughts..."
Next in thread: Jamie Lokier: "Re: PATCH thoughts..."

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 6 June 2008 08:04:28 GMT