W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2003

Re: BNF inconsistency in Language tag in RFC2616

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:54:41 -0700
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
To: Jim Gettys <Jim.Gettys@hp.com>
Message-Id: <602B74C8-E890-11D7-A496-000393753936@day.com>


> Is there any danger in relaxing the HTTP BNF to remove the
> inconsistency (the hob-goblin of small minds :-))?

No danger -- it may even be possible to replace them with a reference to
the new RFC if it is now a BCP.

....Roy

Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2003 17:56:21 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Previous message: Alex Rousskov: "compliant proxies found, at last"
In reply to: Jim Gettys: "BNF inconsistency in Language tag in RFC2616"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 03:48:51 GMT