W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1999

Re: Upgrading to TLS Within HTTP/1.1 draft available

From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 20:28:55 +0100
Message-ID: <37791E77.14DD4DB7@algroup.co.uk>
To: John Stracke <francis@ecal.com>
CC: "Http-Wg@Hplb. Hpl. Hp. Com" <http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
John Stracke wrote:
> Ben Laurie wrote:
> > Scott Lawrence wrote:
> > > In any event, separate ports are orthogonal to separate processes; one does
> > > not imply or require the other.
> >
> > I think the point is the reverse one: a single port requires a single
> > process (or at least a family of related processes). I cannot run two
> > different pieces of software on one port _and_ get reasonable
> > performance
> It's possible on most Unices, where you can pass file descriptors from one
> process to another.  They need to cooperate, though, and the receiving process
> has to trust the sending process not to play man-in-the-middle games.

It is possible, but not particularly efficient or portable. ISTR one of
the very first things Apache did was to get rid of that nonsense.




"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
     - Indira Gandhi
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 1999 20:30:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:23 UTC