Jeff Mogul pointed out that "Pragma: no-cache" is not a response header, and "in retrospect, I think the wording of the specification of Pragma should have included a Note to this effect, because lots of people seem to be confused by this (even me, at times)." But I couldn't think of a simple 'Note' to add that would be only editorial, so I decided not to pursue this. Is this simple enough? (at the end of section 14.32) Note: because the meaning of "Pragma: no-cache" as a response header field is not actually specified, it does not provide a reliable replacement for "Cache-control: no-cache" in a response. -JeffReceived on Tuesday, 2 March 1999 00:47:41 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:33:30 EDT