W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1998

Re: CNONCE: proposed resolution

From: Scott Lawrence <lawrence@agranat.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1998 21:20:32 +0000
Message-Id: <35C629A0.DA2A16CA@agranat.com>
To: Paul Leach <paulle@microsoft.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/299
Paul Leach wrote:

> I think that absence of cnonce should be illegal if qop=auth or
> qop=auth-int is selected by the client; if the client really _demands_ 
> to be totally braindead, it can send a constant as its cnonce.

I'm also happy with that solution.

Scott Lawrence           Consulting Engineer      <lawrence@agranat.com>
Agranat Systems, Inc.  Embedded Web Technology   http://www.agranat.com/
Received on Monday, 3 August 1998 14:22:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:22 UTC