W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1997

Re: draft-lundblade-1pass-mult-alt-00.txt vs. alternates

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 14:46:51 PST
Message-Id: <346A31DB.84BA6731@parc.xerox.com>
To: Graham Klyne <GK@acm.org>
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com 
> I think the answer hinges mainly on the use of "absolute URIs" in the
> 'alternates' draft, which seems (at best) rather awkward when trying to
> refer to body parts within the same MIME entity.  But I am not well
> qualified in this matter.

The 'cid:' URI is used just for this purpose: to refer to body parts within the
same MIME entity. (RFC 2111: Content-ID and Message-ID Uniform Resource
Locators.)

Larry
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 1997 14:50:32 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:33:02 EDT