W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1997

RE: [Fwd: 301/302]

From: Wingard, Steve <swingard@spyglass.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 15:59:33 -0500
Message-Id: <c=US%a=_%p=Spyglass%l=SPYBEM01-970729205933Z-10251@spybem01.nap.spyglass.com>
To: 'Josh Cohen' <josh@netscape.com>, "'http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com'" <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
On Tuesday, July 29, 1997 3:43 PM, Josh Cohen [SMTP:josh@netscape.com]
wrote:
> -- 
> Well, what about when foo.cgi is running on a 1.1 server, and
> doesnt give a content-length.
> Is the 1.1 server responsible to detect and chunk that ?

That's the approach that we decided to take in our server.   It's done
pretty
much across the board with non-file-based content:  CGI, ISAPI
applications
or ADI modules (ADI is our own server API)

Steve Wingard
Spyglass, Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 29 July 1997 14:01:41 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:32:50 EDT