W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1997

Re: Proposed resolution for the STATUS100 issue

From: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 97 16:53:05 MDT
Message-Id: <9707172353.AA17423@acetes.pa.dec.com>
To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com> writes:

    In order to allow maximum flexibility shouldn't:

	o  A client MUST be prepared to accept a 100 (Continue) status
	message followed by a regular response, even if the client does
	not expect a 100 (Continue) status message.

    Instead read:

	A client MUST be prepared to accept 100 (Continue) status
	messages...
    
How about this?

   o  A client MUST be prepared to accept one or more 100 (Continue)
      status messages prior to a regular response, even if the client
      does not expect a 100 (Continue) status message.

-Jeff
Received on Thursday, 17 July 1997 17:06:34 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:32:48 EDT