W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1997

Re: ISSUE VARY: Proposed wording

From: David W. Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 22:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
To: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
Cc: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@w3.org>, http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.3.96.970709224335.26041C-100000@shell1.aimnet.com>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/3715

On Wed, 9 Jul 1997, Jeffrey Mogul wrote:

> I think the first part is still somewhat misleading.  How about:
>     If the representation was selected using criteria not limited to
>     the request-headers, then the server MUST include a "Vary: *"
>     header field in the response.
>     In this case, a cache MUST NOT use the response in
>     a reply to a subsequent request unless the cache relays the new
>     request to the origin server in a conditional request and the
>     server responds with 304 (Not Modified), including an entity tag or
>     Content-Location that indicates which entity should be used.
> As long as we are going to say MUST, we should be explicit about
> what the requirement is.

I vote for your variant. I didn't really care for the prior version
with a header talking to a cache.

Dave Morris
Received on Wednesday, 9 July 1997 22:49:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:20 UTC