W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1997

Re: NS, Verisign, Firefly proposal [was Re: Revised charter , milestones

From: <guthery@austin.sar.slb.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 02:01:32 -0500
Message-Id: <199705290701.CAA01054@asterix>
To: paulh@imc.org
Cc: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/3357
Paul Hoffman says ...

>IMHO, discussing technology for which there is no published specification,
>much less technology that will not be formed in the IETF, is probably not a
>good use of this mailing list. When the technology is released from the W3C
>WG, this group can assess how it affects the HTTP protocol, but not until


1) The press release says the spec will be released on the 27th.  It wasn't.

2) Netscape evidentally doesn't know the difference between a spec 
   and a press release.

3) What we have here is a closed open process.  What did the caterpillar say?
Received on Thursday, 29 May 1997 00:07:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:20 UTC