W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > January to April 1997

Re: Ted Hardie's comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt

From: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 1997 21:26:35 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <199702232026.VAA00948@wsooti08.win.tue.nl>
To: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
Cc: masinter@parc.xerox.com, http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/2538
Jeffrey Mogul:
>    I think you will do yourself and the IESG a service by identifying
>    in the document itself the ways in which it is controversial,
>    and at least mentioning the alternatives that have been proposed
>    ("statistical sampling") even though not explored.
>I would be happy to cite, in the next revision of the hit-metering
>draft, any documents that specify alternative proposals.

Two pretty comprehensive references:


Some specific proposals:


Received on Sunday, 23 February 1997 12:29:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:19 UTC