- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@liege.ICS.UCI.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 1996 07:10:35 -0700
- To: Gavin Nicol <gtn@ebt.com>
- Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
>>has already been solved in a number of ways in practice. What they should >>have done is just recommend using the existing methods of handling >>charset-varying input until such time as there was a new method for GET+body. > > This is actually very close to what I had in mind, though I tend to > be more of the "let's get the GET-with-body ASAP" mind. That is, I > think, the correct solution. The other I18N authors did not agree > entirely with my stance. Well, I'd say this is the time to define it. If there is a working definition and evidence that it is useful, a new method is the way to go. The hard part is deciding on a name. My vote is for QUERY, but someone else gets to write the ID. .....Roy
Received on Thursday, 10 October 1996 07:18:30 UTC