W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1996

Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 22:30:57 -0400
Message-Id: <9609260230.AA20163@sulphur.osf.org>
To: fielding@liege.ICS.UCI.EDU, koen@win.tue.nl
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/1628
>I would prefer `Negotiate: t' myself, since the 'cn' serves no useful
>purpose given the context.  I was thinking of using `Negotiate: a'
>for pure agent-driven negotiation (without the proxy mumbo jumbo).

Please no.  Is the savings of "cn" or "gent-driven" enough to justify
(a) the possible confusion; and (b) the rush to use the other 24 letters?
	/r$
Received on Wednesday, 25 September 1996 19:45:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:18 UTC