- From: David W. Morris <dwm@shell.portal.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Aug 1996 10:51:40 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Paul Leach <paulle@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "'Roy T. Fielding'" <fielding@liege.ICS.UCI.EDU>, 'http-wg' <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
On Thu, 8 Aug 1996, Paul Leach wrote: > is not forced to do extra work. The only drawback I can see is if the > client wants to do abbreviations but not do sticky headers. I don't know > if that is likely. I can certainly see use of abbreviations w/o sticky headers. The complexity of implementing abbreviations is an order of magnitude or more less while still achieving a reduction in wire traffic. Dave Morris
Received on Thursday, 8 August 1996 10:55:39 UTC