W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1996

RE: Sticky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)

From: David W. Morris <dwm@shell.portal.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 1996 10:51:40 -0700 (PDT)
To: Paul Leach <paulle@microsoft.com>
Cc: "'Roy T. Fielding'" <fielding@liege.ICS.UCI.EDU>, 'http-wg' <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960808102001.13865C-100000@jobe.shell.portal.com>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/1251

On Thu, 8 Aug 1996, Paul Leach wrote:

> is not forced to do extra work. The only drawback I can see is if the
> client wants to do abbreviations but not do sticky headers. I don't know
> if that is likely.

I can certainly see use of abbreviations w/o sticky headers. The
complexity of implementing abbreviations is an order of magnitude or more
less while still achieving a reduction in wire traffic.

Dave Morris
Received on Thursday, 8 August 1996 10:55:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:17 UTC