- From: Paul Leach <paulle@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Aug 1996 10:02:01 -0700
- To: 'http-wg' <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
The shorter length of most of the names is good. I really don't understand why x and y size for the display were separated. I can't really see caching using Vary based only on x or y. So, I'd suggest: UA-pix: <x-size> x <y-size> because it's shorter and no significant loss of functionlity. I also don't understand the rationale behind UA-media-<type> introducing many extra header names, instead of UA-media: <type> which seems like it works just as well conceptually, and fits perfectly into Vary based caching. Bottom line -- I'd like it to be more like it was before, but with the shorter names. ---------------------------------------------------- Paul J. Leach Email: paulle@microsoft.com Microsoft Phone: 1-206-882-8080 1 Microsoft Way Fax: 1-206-936-7329 Redmond, WA 98052
Received on Tuesday, 6 August 1996 10:09:12 UTC