- From: Drazen Kacar <dave@fly.cc.fer.hr>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 1996 01:23:14 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: mirsad.todorovac@fer.hr
- Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Mirsad Todorovac wrote: > > - let's suppose that browser cannot accept document charset, then > document should be translated into charset which is supported > by browser, but lest likely to loose some characters > > (Example: with CP-1250 and iso-8859-2 there are only some > swapped blocks of chars, says Dave, so then there should Not only swapped blocks. In ISO 8859-2 positions from 129 to 159 are not used. CP1250 uses all 256 characters. > never be a loss in conversion, but we don't need to have > both, duplicate versions of documents -- one for UN*X > machines, and one for Wind*ws CEE [and still more for > other platforms ...] This is an implementation question and does not belong here really. However, I think it's good to point out these things from time to time because some (most?) implementors don't know about it. -- Life is a sexually transmitted disease. dave@fly.cc.fer.hr dave@zemris.fer.hr
Received on Thursday, 11 July 1996 16:29:05 UTC