W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1996

Re: short names for headers

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@liege.ICS.UCI.EDU>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 19:05:36 -0700
To: marc@ckm.ucsf.edu
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <9607101905.aa15214@paris.ics.uci.edu>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/1091
> from minutes, HTTP Working Group, IETF June 96, Montreal
> |Aug 1:   (Leach)   draft on sticky headers, short names for headers, and
>Can short names for headers (Good Idea) be compatible with existing practice in
>HTTP/1.x or must it wait until 2.x?  Does allowing aliases for the names of the
>header fields alter the general message parsing algorithm or message semantics
>as specified in 3.1 of HTTP/1.1?

Yes, it does -- changing existing header field names (i.e., short names or
tokenizing) can only be done in HTTP/2.x.  Besides, it doesn't make any
sense to introduce short names now when the GOAL should be a multiplexed
and tokenized grammar for HTTP/2.0, and that can be accomplished in six
months if people don't waste their time on minor tweaks that are equally
incompatible with 1.x.

 ...Roy T. Fielding
    Department of Information & Computer Science    (fielding@ics.uci.edu)
    University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3425    fax:+1(714)824-4056
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 1996 19:12:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:17 UTC