W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1996

Re: v11-03 COMMENT: 16.1 Semantic Transparency

From: Dave Kristol <dmk@allegra.att.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 96 09:50:45 EDT
Message-Id: <9605151350.AA21554@zp.tempo.att.com.tempo.att.com>
To: mogul@pa.dec.com
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com> wrote:
  > That's a reasonable suggestion.  I'd reword it slightly, 
  > 
  >     ... the protocol requires that transparency may be relaxed only
  > 
  >   .  by an explicit protocol-level request (when relaxed by client
  >      or origin server)
  >   .  and with an explicit warning to the end user (when relaxed by
  >      cache or client)

And I'll have another go:

... the protocol requires that transparency may be relaxed
. only by an explicit protocol-level request (when relaxed by client
  or origin server)
. and only with an explicit warning to the end user (when relaxed by
  cache or client)

Dave Kristol
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 1996 06:55:22 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:32:00 EDT