W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1996

Re: revision of "content coding" and "advise to RFC Editor"

From: Erik van der Poel <erik@netscape.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 1996 11:21:28 -0700
Message-Id: <31B47EA8.63DE@netscape.com>
To: Keld J|rn Simonsen <keld@dkuug.dk>
Cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/778
Keld Simonsen wrote:
> It should rather be "UTF-8" than "UNICODE-1-1-UTF-8"
> as per the UTF-8 RFC.

Which RFC are you referring to? Is it the following?


Or perhaps:


Was "UTF-8" actually registered with IANA? The following does not
include "UTF-8":


UTF-8 is also not included in the Assigned Numbers RFC:


Received on Tuesday, 4 June 1996 11:25:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:17 UTC