W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1996

Re: Shortening the draft.

From: Gregory J. Woodhouse <gjw@wnetc.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 12:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
To: hallam@etna.ai.mit.edu
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <Pine.SGI.3.93.960523123042.18189A-100000@shellx.best.com>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/535
On Thu, 23 May 1996 hallam@Etna.ai.mit.edu wrote:

> Hi,
> 	Just had a thought that might shorten the draft somewhat, how about 
> issuing the definition of the ebnf as a separate RFC? This would remove a whole 
> section.
This makes a lot of sense. The EBNF section is included in a number of
places besides the HTTP drafts. I think we've definitely reched the point
where a separate RFC is justified. I also agree with you that this sort ofr
change is more appropriate for future versions so HTTP 1.1 isn't needlessly

Gregory Woodhouse     gjw@wnetc.com
home page:            http://www.wnetc.com/
resource page:        http://www.wnetc.com/resource/
Received on Thursday, 23 May 1996 12:39:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:17 UTC