W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1995

Re: Content-Transfer-Encoding

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 1995 02:20:06 PDT
To: dmk@allegra.att.com
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <95Aug1.022008pdt.2762@golden.parc.xerox.com>
a) I think we should pay attention to Harald's request that we not
call it a C-T-E. Even though we can justify that usage ourselves,
there's no harm in using a different header in HTTP, is there?

b) I'll give up calling for a string-terminated boundary marker if no
one else thinks it is worthwhile.

c) So far the HTTP WG has avoided specifying what happens with CGI --
it's out of scope of the WG, platform dependent, etc. However, changes
to HTTP do affect CGI, so should be considered.
Received on Tuesday, 1 August 1995 02:22:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:14 UTC