W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1995

Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal

From: Chuck Shotton <cshotton@biap.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 15:50:19 -0500
Message-Id: <v02110118abe1635133dc@[]>
To: Brian Behlendorf <brian@organic.com>, David - Morris <dwm@shell.portal.com>
Cc: John Franks <john@math.nwu.edu>, luotonen@netscape.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
At 3:24 PM 5/18/95, Chuck Shotton wrote:
>Says who? Who said anything about proxies trying to be cute in the middle
>of byte range requests? The proxy should pass the request and the resulting
>data through unadulterated to the client and it SHOULDN'T cache it. Ever.
>These byte range requests should be treated like CGI requests, which should
>have the results of the request cached.

Gack! That should read "which SHOULDN'T have the results of the request cached."

Chuck Shotton
cshotton@biap.com                                  http://www.biap.com/
cshotton@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu                           "I am NOT here."
Received on Thursday, 18 May 1995 13:50:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:14 UTC