W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1995

Re: Worries about content-length

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Date: Tue, 9 May 1995 11:00:57 PDT
To: dee@cybercash.com
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <95May9.110103pdt.2761@golden.parc.xerox.com>
> I just joined this list so I have probably missed earlier parts of
> this conversation, but on a miknor point, why not just allow the
> "boundary=" parameter on top level Context-Type: headers that don't
> normally have this parameter instead of inventing a whole new
> Content-Terminator: header?

Because it would be wrong. The 'boundary' isn't a property of
image/gif. If you extract the document and then include it in a mail
message, you don't suddenly change it from "content-type: image/gif;
boundary=foo" to "content-type: image/gif". The content-type should
not change based on the method of transfer.

The boundary is best thought of as a property of the
content-transfer-encoding rather than of the content-type.
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 1995 11:05:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:14 UTC