Re: Drafting mux WG charter

From: spreitze@parc.xerox.com
Date: Tue, Feb 09 1999

Next message: spreitze@parc.xerox.com: "Re: Drafting mux WG charter"
Previous message: Jim Whitehead: "RE: Drafting mux WG charter"
In reply to: Jim Whitehead: "RE: Drafting mux WG charter"
Next in thread: spreitze@parc.xerox.com: "Re: Drafting mux WG charter"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

From: spreitze@parc.xerox.com
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 12:55:37 PST
To: ejw@ics.uci.edu
Cc: spreitze@parc.xerox.com, ietf-http-ng@w3.org
Message-Id: <99Feb9.125553pst."105927"@augustus.parc.xerox.com>
Subject: Re: Drafting mux WG charter


I think the goals document should not be a throwaway, but an Informational RFC.  I'll make that clearer.

Thanks,
Mike

Next message: spreitze@parc.xerox.com: "Re: Drafting mux WG charter"
Previous message: Jim Whitehead: "RE: Drafting mux WG charter"
In reply to: Jim Whitehead: "RE: Drafting mux WG charter"
Next in thread: spreitze@parc.xerox.com: "Re: Drafting mux WG charter"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]