RE: Drafting mux WG charter

From: Jim Whitehead (ejw@ics.uci.edu)
Date: Tue, Feb 09 1999


From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@ics.uci.edu>
To: Mike Spreitzer <spreitze@parc.xerox.com>, ietf-http-ng@w3.org
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 12:40:32 -0800
Message-ID: <001101be546c$704dca60$d115c380@galileo.ics.uci.edu>
Subject: RE: Drafting mux WG charter



>  I've just posted a new mux WG
> charter draft, at
>
> <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP-NG/1999/02/mux-Charter-209.html>

I'm assuming it's just an oversight, but the timeline doesn't include an
explicit action item for submitting the goals document for approval as an
Informational RFC.  Is the goals document intended to be submitted as an
Informational RFC, or is it a throwaway?

- Jim