RE: Submission of HTTP Extension Framework (Mandatory)

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (frystyk@w3.org)
Date: Tue, Aug 18 1998


Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980818120007.031eac50@localhost>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 12:00:07 -0400
To: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>, "'ietf-http-ext@w3.org'" <ietf-http-ext@w3.org>
From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Submission of HTTP Extension Framework (Mandatory)

At 12:51 8/17/98 -0700, Yaron Goland wrote:

>I certainly don't want this "solution" to have to stick around for one
>second longer than absolutely necessary. How about language along the lines
>of "If you are communicating over a 1.1 end to end connection then you MUST
>use the stuff Henrik specifies, if, however you are communicating over a 1.0
>connection you either MUST reject the method or you MUST use the hacky
>nightmare Yaron specified." The idea is that you don't have to support the
>1.0 hack to be compliant with Mandatory but if you do decide to work over
>1.0 then you MUST work as I specified.
>
>Sound reasonable?

yep - we can have this in by next week.

Henrik
--
Henrik Frystyk Nielsen,
World Wide Web Consortium
http://www.w3.org/People/Frystyk