Issues: UNCONDITIONAL_COMPLIANCE = Proposed wording
From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (frystyk@w3.org)
Date: Wed, Mar 11 1998
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980311134040.0351b200@localhost>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 13:40:40 -0500
To: ietf-http-ext@w3.org
From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@w3.org>
Subject: Issues: UNCONDITIONAL_COMPLIANCE = Proposed wording
In section 3, change
An extension declaration can be used to indicate that an extension has
been applied to a message and possibly to reserve a part of the header
namespace identified by a header field prefix (see 3.1).
to
An extension declaration can be used to indicate that an
extension has been applied to a message and possibly to
reserve a part of the header namespace identified by a header
field prefix (see 3.1).
This specification does not define any ramifications of
applying an extension to a message nor whether two
extensions can or cannot coexist within the same message.
It is strictly a framework for describing which extensions
have been applied and what the recipient either must or may
do in order to properly interpret any extension declarations
within a message.
and add in section 5, change
An HTTP server MUST NOT return a 2xx status-code without obeying all
mandatory extension declaration(s) in a mandatory request.
to
An HTTP server MUST NOT return a 2xx status-code without
being unconditionally compliant with all mandatory extension
declaration(s) in a mandatory request.
Comments?
Henrik
--
Henrik Frystyk Nielsen,
World Wide Web Consortium
http://www.w3.org/People/Frystyk