- From: Marshall T. Rose <mrose+mtr.netnews@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:38:29 -0800
- To: <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
- Cc: "Marshall Rose" <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
> >may i ask that you and ned send email to each of the WGs in question, > >comparing their progress to their charter, and giving them a short amount of > >time to show progress or be nuke'd. > > We are NOT after killing things because it is fun. and i hope you didn't think i was implying otherwise... > We want progress. If either this mail from me, or a future ping from > me and Ned make the wg start work again, fine. > > >a charter represents a contract between the ADs and a WG. the reasons that > >charters have milestones with dates is so that everyone can understand the > >timeliness and metabolism of the project and principals. > > Exactly! > > >when WGs go stale but don't die, they prevent other WGs from being formed. > >this is plainly unfair... > > Exactly my point in my initial message. wg's _DO_ use resources just > by existing. we are certainly in agreement. /mtr
Received on Thursday, 18 January 2001 13:39:09 UTC