W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-discuss@w3.org > January 2001

Re: Wg's which have not made progress lately

From: Marshall T. Rose <mrose+mtr.netnews@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:38:29 -0800
Message-ID: <01ad01c0817d$da8de000$8753cf3f@FATORA>
To: <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
Cc: "Marshall Rose" <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
> >may i ask that you and ned send email to each of the WGs in question,
> >comparing their progress to their charter, and giving them a short amount
of
> >time to show progress or be nuke'd.
>
> We are NOT after killing things because it is fun.

and i hope you didn't think i was implying otherwise...


> We want progress. If either this mail from me, or a future ping from
> me and Ned make the wg start work again, fine.
>
> >a charter represents a contract between the ADs and a WG. the reasons
that
> >charters have milestones with dates is so that everyone can understand
the
> >timeliness and metabolism of the project and principals.
>
> Exactly!
>
> >when WGs go stale but don't die, they prevent other WGs from being
formed.
> >this is plainly unfair...
>
> Exactly my point in my initial message. wg's _DO_ use resources just
> by existing.

we are certainly in agreement.

/mtr
Received on Thursday, 18 January 2001 13:39:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 23 March 2006 20:11:27 GMT