W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-discuss@w3.org > January 2001

Re: Wg's which have not made progress lately

From: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 19:05:49 +0100
Message-Id: <p0510081cb68ce0b51ecc@[156.106.209.62]>
To: "Marshall T. Rose" <mrose+mtr.netnews@dbc.mtview.ca.us>, <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
Cc: "Marshall Rose" <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
At 09.15 -0800 01-01-18, Marshall T. Rose wrote:
>may i ask that you and ned send email to each of the WGs in question,
>comparing their progress to their charter, and giving them a short amount of
>time to show progress or be nuke'd.

We are NOT after killing things because it is fun.

We want progress. If either this mail from me, or a future ping from 
me and Ned make the wg start work again, fine.

>a charter represents a contract between the ADs and a WG. the reasons that
>charters have milestones with dates is so that everyone can understand the
>timeliness and metabolism of the project and principals.

Exactly!

>when WGs go stale but don't die, they prevent other WGs from being formed.
>this is plainly unfair...

Exactly my point in my initial message. wg's _DO_ use resources just 
by existing.

   paf



-- 
Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>       Internet Engineering Task Force
Area Director, Applications Area                   http://www.ietf.org
Phone: (Stockholm) +46-8-4494212            (San Jose) +1-408-525-0940
        PGP: 2DFC AAF6 16F0 F276 7843  2DC1 BC79 51D9 7D25 B8DC
Received on Thursday, 18 January 2001 13:10:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 23 March 2006 20:11:27 GMT