> -----Original Message----- > From: Keith Moore [mailto:moore@cs.utk.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 1999 2:50 AM > To: Josh Cohen (Exchange) > Cc: Harald Tveit Alvestrand; Yaron Goland (Exchange); 'Patrik > Faltstrom'; Scott Lawrence; moore@cs.utk.edu; discuss@apps.ietf.org; > Peter Ford (Exchange) > Subject: Re: HTTP Extensions Framework status? > > > > > Maybe all APPS standards should have experimental, or an > > equivalent, as a necessary first step in getting to standards > > track proposed. > > I've wondered about this - maybe groups should have to publish > as Experimental, and implement the protocol, before going to > Proposed. It might get people focused on "running code" sooner > rather than later, and some groups need that. I'd like to see > a few groups try it before recommending it for everyone in APPS. > I like this response. It sounds like a good thing to trial. However, its still tough to take the stigma of experimental, would be it possible to have the state called "standards-track experimental"?Received on Tuesday, 7 December 1999 19:20:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:38:00 UTC