Section 13.1 of the spec says that the DAV:resourcetype of an activity must be DAV:activity. This would seem to disallow an implementation where the resourcetype was, say: <resourcetype xmlns="DAV:"> <activity/> <collection/> </resourcetype> Is there a reason for saying that an activity's resourcetype must be (rather than include) DAV:activity? -- Alison.Received on Monday, 13 October 2003 13:52:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:44 GMT