W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > July to September 2002

RE: DASL and DELTA-V properties

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 14:28:20 +0200
To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>, <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Cc: "Kazeroni, Ladan" <Ladan.Kazeroni@softwareag.com>, "Nevermann, Dr., Peter" <Peter.Nevermann@softwareag.com>, "Wallmer, Martin" <Martin.Wallmer@softwareag.com>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCIEAOFCAA.julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>

Wait-a-minute :-)

> From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org
> [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 2:19 PM
> To: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org; ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
> Cc: Kazeroni, Ladan; Nevermann, Dr., Peter; Wallmer, Martin
> Subject: RE: DASL and DELTA-V properties
>
>
>
> I agree with Julian.  DAV:allprop SEARCH should be defined to
> have the same behavior as DAV:allprop.  In particular, it
> should not search RFC-3253 properties.

Yes, it should SEARCH them (if used in the where clause). No, it shouldn't
report them (when select uses allprop).

> The current proposal for the next revision of 2518 is that
> it should only search dead properties and properties
> defined in RFC-2518.

sed s/search/report/
Received on Monday, 12 August 2002 08:28:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:43 GMT